So you’re able to evaluate our next hypothesis, i basic recoded, each of the items on the standing measure, the newest portion of responses one tell you when the husbands have less, equal or even more ratings, specifically, updates, having hypogamy, which means husbands provides straight down reputation than just wives, homogamy, definition equal status, and you can hypergamy, meaning husbands with higher position than simply wives. To the prospective organization out of country, analyses have been high in the training (X dos =11.9; df=2; p=.003; n=.20), and you will financial effect out of a potential divorce (X 2 =nine.51; df=2; p=.009; n=.18). Data showed that, for Language players, there clearly was so much more education hypogamy, whereas to have Dominican players there was more degree homogamy. Towards financial affairs if there is splitting up, since there is so much more homogamy getting Spanish professionals, there’s even more hypergamy to possess Dominicans (discover Figure 1).
Which have previous failed marriages or otherwise not wasn’t associated so you’re able to variations in reputation. In regards to the potential association between updates and many years married, significant associations was utilized in wellness (X dos =14.7; df=4; p=.005; n=.16), even though getting people y is available (forty.4%, each), for lovers y is available (43.4%). To phrase it differently, towards class with additional ages hitched, husbands has actually down health position. Which have people regarding previous failed marriages and achieving youngsters regarding current relationships don’t significantly apply at condition.
For the contribution, the newest analyses about the 2nd theory indicated that in comparison to the requirement, the greatest function relevant in order to status is the nation.
Univariate assessment revealed significant variations in basis step one (F=5
To contrast our third hypothesis, that predict that homogamy will be associated to higher marital satisfaction for both countries, we have estimated the scores in ong the three types of status (hypogamy, homogamy, and hypergamy) for the seven items of the scale. The analyses revealed significant differences in bda=.951, F(6, 584)= 2.47; p<.05]. Univariate tests revealed significant differences in factor 2 of marital satisfaction (F=4.54; df=2; p<.05; h 2 =.01), with no significant differences by country. Post hoc comparisons revealed that hypergamy in health status have significantly smaller y situations (M=4.14, SE=0.11; and M=4.57, SE=0.10, respectively).
Also, significant differences in marital satisfaction based on education status were found [Wilks’ Lambda=.938, F(6, 584)= 3.17; p<.01]. 46; df=2; p<.01; h 2 =.03), and total scale (F=3.61; df=2; p<.05; h 2 =.XX). There were also significant differences in factor 1 by country (F=; df=1; p<.001; h 2 =.04), as well as by the interaction of status by country (F=4.90; df=2; p<.05; h 2 =.03). Post hoc comparisons revealed that hypogamic education status situations have significantly smaller ic situations (M=4.18, SE=0.11; and M=4.58, SE=0.11, respectively). In addition, hypergamy situations in Spain and Dominican Republic scored significantly higher than hypogamy situations in Spain. Homogamy situations in Dominican Republic scored significantly higher than hypogamy situations in Spain.
Finally, hypogamy circumstances inside Spain obtained significantly lower than hypogamy situations in Dominican Republic
http://www.datingranking.net/nl/cougar-life-overzicht
Likewise, significant differences in marital satisfaction based on economic status were found [Wilks’ Lambda=.937, F(6, 584)= 3.21; p<.01]. Univariate tests revealed significant differences in factor 1 (F=6.64; df=2; p<.01; h 2 =.04). There were also significant differences in factor 1 by country (F=; df=1; p<.001; h 2 =.03), with Dominicans scoring significantly higher than Spaniards (M=4.8, SE=.015, and M=4.34, SE=.10, respectively). Economic hypergamy was associated to significantly higher ic and hypogamic status. Spaniards with hypergamy status scored significantly higher than the other two groups from Spain. Dominicans with hypogamic status scored significantly lower than the other two groups from the same country.
Additionally, significant differences in marital satisfaction based on housekeeping status were found [Wilks’ Lambda=.920, F(6, 584)= 4.12; p<.001]. Univariate tests revealed significant differences in factor 1 (F=; df=2; p<.001; h 2 =.06), and total scale (F=6.84; df=2; p=.001; h 2 =.04), without significant differences by country. Hypogamy status was associated to significantly higher y status (M=4.88, SE=.14, M=4.34, SE=.07, respectively).
Læg en kommentar